Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slipstream (2005 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW keep. Participation in the discussion following improvements to the article leaves no reasonable possibility that this will be deleted. BD2412 T 01:46, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slipstream (2005 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another TV film with no evidence of notability in site. There are no references in the article. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources other than the website for the program and imdb. Oaktree b (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Review at Dutch site [[1]] Donaldd23 (talk) 02:23, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've done a major overhaul of the article as far as adding sourcing goes. It's not the most major film, but I found enough to flesh out the article fairly well. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article now has evidence of notability, having been massively improved since it was nominated for deletion. [2] DVD Talk is a reliable source that reviewed it, as did https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-xpm-2005-02-16-0502140309-story.html Dream Focus 09:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep appears notable but not necessarily reputable :P Sadads (talk) 23:52, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks to the WP:HEY efforts made and uncovering sources. Quality ≠ Notability... -2pou (talk) 22:20, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.